You may have noticed our law firm’s website recently posted a notice announcing a change to our website’s privacy policy. You may have seen other website publishers do something similar from time to time, as well. Do you wonder why?
Announcing a change to your website privacy policy is important for at least two reasons.
First, if your privacy policy tells the public that you will announce changes, then you need to announce changes. After all, your company’s privacy policy is a contract between your company and users of the website. You need to live up to the promises made in the policy or a regulator may take notice (see below). It is generally acceptable to make changes to your website privacy policy after it is first published, but you should tell users that you reserve the right to do so.
Second, agreeing to announce a website privacy policy change and then making the announcement of a change is a best “fair information” practice, and one the Federal Trade Commission advises you to follow. Website users who come to your company’s website and submit personal information in reliance on your earlier published privacy policy may make a different choice about continuing to use your site and submitting personal data once the new policy goes into effect. Letting users know about changes to the privacy policy allows them to make informed choices about their personal information. In fact, if a change is significant – for example, if your company starts sharing or using already collected personal data for a new and unexpected purpose – a more prominent notice, and possibly consent, may be required.
A 2014 letter from the FTC staff related to Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp is instructive on the issue of website privacy policy changes. In that letter, a top FTC regulator advised the companies that regardless of the acquisition by Facebook, WhatsApp was required to honor its more protective privacy policies with regard to consumer data it had collected, and that if it failed to do so, both companies could be subject to enforcement. The letter notes that prior FTC decisions made clear that “absent affirmative express consent by a consumer, a company cannot use data in a manner that is materially inconsistent with promises made at the time the data was collected, and that such use of data could be an unfair practice under Section 5 [of the FTC Act].”
One other useful nugget from the 2014 letter about prospective policy changes: the FTC “recommended” to Facebook and WhatsApp that if they chose to change how they collected, used, and shared newly collected data from users, they should offer consumers an opportunity to opt out of the changes or make clear to consumers that they have an opportunity to stop using the service.
So what did our law firm change in our privacy policy? Our site uses Google Analytics, and we had an external link to its privacy policy. That link changed, so we updated the link and the “updated as of” date.
Add a comment
Archives
- January 2022
- June 2021
- March 2020
- August 2019
- March 2019
- October 2018
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- July 2014
- March 2014
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2006
- February 2006
Recent Posts
- Rethinking Your Cyber Insurance Needs as Your Workplace Evolves
- Data Breach Defense for Educational Institutions
- COVID-19 and the Increased Cybersecurity Risk in a Work-From-Home World
- Like Incorporating Facebook into your Website? EU Decision Raises New Issues
- Lessons Learned: Key Takeaways for Every Business from the Capital One Data Breach
- Will Quick Talks to WRAL About Privacy Issues Related to Doorbell Cameras
- About Us
- Not in My House - California to Regulate IoT Device Security
- Ninth Circuit Says You’re Going to Jail for Visiting That Website without Permission
- Ninth Circuit Interprets “Without Authorization” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Topics
- Data Security
- Data Breach
- Privacy
- Cyberattack
- Defamation
- Public Records
- FCC Matters
- Digital Media and Data Privacy Law
- Reporters Privilege
- Political Advertising
- Newsroom Subpoenas
- Shield Laws
- Miscellaneous
- Internet
- Indecency
- First Amendment
- Anti-SLAPP Statutes
- Education
- Fair Report Privilege
- Prior Restraints
- Wiretapping
- Access to Courtrooms
- FOIA
- Privacy Policies
- HIPAA
- Drone Law
- Access to Court Dockets
- Access to Search Warrants
- Intrusion
- First Amendment Retaliation
- Mobile Privacy
- Newsroom Search Warrants
- About This Blog
- Disclaimer
- Services